Battle of Stones River

The Forgotten Conflict between the Confederate Army of Tennessee and the Union Army of the Cumberland

Nonfiction, History, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877)
Cover of the book Battle of Stones River by Larry J. Daniel, LSU Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Larry J. Daniel ISBN: 9780807145180
Publisher: LSU Press Publication: November 5, 2012
Imprint: LSU Press Language: English
Author: Larry J. Daniel
ISBN: 9780807145180
Publisher: LSU Press
Publication: November 5, 2012
Imprint: LSU Press
Language: English

Three days of savage and bloody fighting between Confederate and Union troops at Stones River in Middle Tennessee ended with nearly 25,000 casualties but no clear victor. The staggering number of killed or wounded equaled the losses suffered in the well-known Battle of Shiloh. Using previously neglected sources, Larry J. Daniel rescues this important campaign from obscurity. The Battle of Stones River, fought between December 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, was a tactical draw but proved to be a strategic northern victory. According to Daniel, Union defeats in late 1862 -- both at Chickasaw Bayou in Mississippi and at Fredericksburg, Virginia -- transformed the clash in Tennessee into a much-needed morale booster for the North.
Daniel's study of the battle's two antagonists, William S. Rosecrans for the Union Army of the Cumberland and Braxton Bragg for the Confederate Army of Tennessee, presents contrasts in leadership and a series of missteps. Union soldiers liked Rosecrans's personable nature, whereas Bragg acquired a reputation as antisocial and suspicious. Rosecrans had won his previous battle at Corinth, and Bragg had failed at the recent Kentucky Campaign. But despite Rosecrans's apparent advantage, both commanders made serious mistakes. With only a few hundred yards separating the lines, Rosecrans allowed Confederates to surprise and route his right ring. Eventually, Union pressure forced Bragg to launch a division-size attack, a disastrous move. Neither side could claim victory on the battlefield.
In the aftermath of the bloody conflict, Union commanders and northern newspapers portrayed the stalemate as a victory, bolstering confidence in the Lincoln administration and dimming the prospects for the "peace wing" of the northern Democratic Party. In the South, the deadlock led to continued bickering in the Confederate western high command and scorn for Braxton Bragg.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Three days of savage and bloody fighting between Confederate and Union troops at Stones River in Middle Tennessee ended with nearly 25,000 casualties but no clear victor. The staggering number of killed or wounded equaled the losses suffered in the well-known Battle of Shiloh. Using previously neglected sources, Larry J. Daniel rescues this important campaign from obscurity. The Battle of Stones River, fought between December 31, 1862, and January 2, 1863, was a tactical draw but proved to be a strategic northern victory. According to Daniel, Union defeats in late 1862 -- both at Chickasaw Bayou in Mississippi and at Fredericksburg, Virginia -- transformed the clash in Tennessee into a much-needed morale booster for the North.
Daniel's study of the battle's two antagonists, William S. Rosecrans for the Union Army of the Cumberland and Braxton Bragg for the Confederate Army of Tennessee, presents contrasts in leadership and a series of missteps. Union soldiers liked Rosecrans's personable nature, whereas Bragg acquired a reputation as antisocial and suspicious. Rosecrans had won his previous battle at Corinth, and Bragg had failed at the recent Kentucky Campaign. But despite Rosecrans's apparent advantage, both commanders made serious mistakes. With only a few hundred yards separating the lines, Rosecrans allowed Confederates to surprise and route his right ring. Eventually, Union pressure forced Bragg to launch a division-size attack, a disastrous move. Neither side could claim victory on the battlefield.
In the aftermath of the bloody conflict, Union commanders and northern newspapers portrayed the stalemate as a victory, bolstering confidence in the Lincoln administration and dimming the prospects for the "peace wing" of the northern Democratic Party. In the South, the deadlock led to continued bickering in the Confederate western high command and scorn for Braxton Bragg.

More books from LSU Press

Cover of the book New Directions in Slavery Studies by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Eon by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Enamel Eyes, a Fantasia on Paris, 1870 by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Confederate Political Economy by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book The Resistance, 1940 by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Black Rage in New Orleans by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book The Southern Middle Class in the Long Nineteenth Century by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Modernizing Tradition by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book God and General Longstreet by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Tomorrow is Another Day by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Out of Speech by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Kriegie by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Preservation Hall by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Faithful Vision by Larry J. Daniel
Cover of the book Representing African Americans in Transatlantic Abolitionism and Blackface Minstrelsy by Larry J. Daniel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy