Bureau of Reclamation Colorado River Dams and Water Projects: Colorado River Project, Dallas Creek Project, Glen Canyon Unit, Smith Fork Project - History, Construction

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Technology, Engineering, Civil
Cover of the book Bureau of Reclamation Colorado River Dams and Water Projects: Colorado River Project, Dallas Creek Project, Glen Canyon Unit, Smith Fork Project - History, Construction by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781311011268
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: October 10, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781311011268
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: October 10, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Four documents from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provide unique insight into the history of Colorado River dams and water projects.

The Colorado River Project (Marshall Ford Dam) - In 1942, the Bureau of Reclamation, in concert with the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) of Texas, oversaw completion of the Marshall Ford Dam(known by Reclamation as the Colorado River Project) on the Colorado River of Texas (not the "other" Colorado River, which runs through six western states). The dam was built in response to the devastating floods that had plagued the capital city of Austin for decades since its establishment as the state capital in 1846. Through the efforts of Texas' incredibly tenacious politicians, such as Lyndon B. Johnson, the city and the land northwest along the Colorado River basin became the focus of a major flood control and hydro-electric project that included six dams, two of which (the Granite Shoals and Marble Falls dams) were added after World War II.

The Dallas Creek Project - In the high mountain valleys of western Colorado, the land is often rich and fertile. But the short growing season and the lack of readily available water make it difficult for farmers to fully utilize the richness of the region's lands. In addition, the short growing season limits the crops which can be grown to those which tend to have low value per acre, making it difficult for farmers to pay for the elaborate irrigation systems necessary to bring a full supply of water to their lands. While it is possible to develop these rich lands, the costs involved make it almost impossible without some kind of assistance. In the late 1950s, the Bureau of Reclamation developed a solution to the cost problem, and the Dallas Creek Project was one of many projects to benefit from that solution. The Dallas Creek Project is located on the Uncompahgre River in west-central Colorado. The area served by the project comprises most of the Uncompahgre River Basin and includes lands in Montrose, Delta, and Ouray Counties. The project is named for Dallas Creek, a major tributary of the Uncompahgre River. Ridgway Dam and Reservoir, the primary features of the project, are located on the Uncompahgre River a few miles north of the town of Ridgway. Lands served by the project run along both sides of the Uncompahgre River northward from Colona to Delta where the Uncompahgre River feeds into the Gunnison River.

The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central Arizona and south central Utah, is one of the more geographically isolated, largest, and most expensive reclamation units ever constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation. It took nearly eight years for crews to top the dam at its height of 710 feet, and another two years for completion of the powerplant. One of four major storage reservoirs along the Colorado and its tributaries as part of the Colorado River Storage Project Act of 1956 (or CRSP), the dam impounds 27,000,000 acre feet—nearly the storage capacity of Hoover Dam—and generates enormous amounts of hydroelectric power for the West.

The Smith Fork Project - When Congressional hearings for the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) took place in 1956, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois, the learned and eloquent former University of Chicago economist, took offense at the notion of paying for reclamation projects on so-called "high-elevation, low-value" farmlands which were doomed to never grow more than cattle forage. The Smith Fork Project in the West Elk foothills of west-central Colorado, sitting at an average elevation of 6300 feet, was such a project. Watering these high desert farms with expensive Federal reclamation projects was a wasteful investment of taxpayers' dollars, claimed Douglas, for even after irrigation participating project lands such as Smith Fork's would not be worth more than a few hundred dollars an acre.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Four documents from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation provide unique insight into the history of Colorado River dams and water projects.

The Colorado River Project (Marshall Ford Dam) - In 1942, the Bureau of Reclamation, in concert with the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) of Texas, oversaw completion of the Marshall Ford Dam(known by Reclamation as the Colorado River Project) on the Colorado River of Texas (not the "other" Colorado River, which runs through six western states). The dam was built in response to the devastating floods that had plagued the capital city of Austin for decades since its establishment as the state capital in 1846. Through the efforts of Texas' incredibly tenacious politicians, such as Lyndon B. Johnson, the city and the land northwest along the Colorado River basin became the focus of a major flood control and hydro-electric project that included six dams, two of which (the Granite Shoals and Marble Falls dams) were added after World War II.

The Dallas Creek Project - In the high mountain valleys of western Colorado, the land is often rich and fertile. But the short growing season and the lack of readily available water make it difficult for farmers to fully utilize the richness of the region's lands. In addition, the short growing season limits the crops which can be grown to those which tend to have low value per acre, making it difficult for farmers to pay for the elaborate irrigation systems necessary to bring a full supply of water to their lands. While it is possible to develop these rich lands, the costs involved make it almost impossible without some kind of assistance. In the late 1950s, the Bureau of Reclamation developed a solution to the cost problem, and the Dallas Creek Project was one of many projects to benefit from that solution. The Dallas Creek Project is located on the Uncompahgre River in west-central Colorado. The area served by the project comprises most of the Uncompahgre River Basin and includes lands in Montrose, Delta, and Ouray Counties. The project is named for Dallas Creek, a major tributary of the Uncompahgre River. Ridgway Dam and Reservoir, the primary features of the project, are located on the Uncompahgre River a few miles north of the town of Ridgway. Lands served by the project run along both sides of the Uncompahgre River northward from Colona to Delta where the Uncompahgre River feeds into the Gunnison River.

The Glen Canyon Unit, located along the Colorado River in north central Arizona and south central Utah, is one of the more geographically isolated, largest, and most expensive reclamation units ever constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation. It took nearly eight years for crews to top the dam at its height of 710 feet, and another two years for completion of the powerplant. One of four major storage reservoirs along the Colorado and its tributaries as part of the Colorado River Storage Project Act of 1956 (or CRSP), the dam impounds 27,000,000 acre feet—nearly the storage capacity of Hoover Dam—and generates enormous amounts of hydroelectric power for the West.

The Smith Fork Project - When Congressional hearings for the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) took place in 1956, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois, the learned and eloquent former University of Chicago economist, took offense at the notion of paying for reclamation projects on so-called "high-elevation, low-value" farmlands which were doomed to never grow more than cattle forage. The Smith Fork Project in the West Elk foothills of west-central Colorado, sitting at an average elevation of 6300 feet, was such a project. Watering these high desert farms with expensive Federal reclamation projects was a wasteful investment of taxpayers' dollars, claimed Douglas, for even after irrigation participating project lands such as Smith Fork's would not be worth more than a few hundred dollars an acre.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book Army National Guard (ARNG) Special Forces (SF) Units: The Standard and the Future - Special Operations for Unconventional Warfare, Core Competencies, Soldier's Personal Perspective by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Transforming the Army with Mission Command: Consideration of Kotter's Eight-Stage Process of Creating Major Change, Creating a Framework for Command Philosophy by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Using Their Own People Against Them: Russia's Exploitation of Ethnicity in Georgia and Ukraine - Putin, Crimea, Donbras, Ethnonationalism Foreign Policy, NATO, Hybrid War and Propaganda, Insurgency by Progressive Management
Cover of the book FBI Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) - Guides for First Responders, Law Enforcement, Death Investigation Guide for Scene Investigator, Fire and Arson Scene Evidence Guide for Public Safety Personnel by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Essential Guide to the Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base: Key Component of the Air Education and Training Command, the Air Force Center for Professional Military Education, AU Catalog by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Nanoscience Technologies Applications, Transitions and Innovations - Nanostrands, Optical, Transistors by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Georgia in Perspective: Orientation Guide and Cultural Orientation: Geography, History, Economy, Religion, Customs, Urban and Rural Life, Black Sea, Sakartvelo, Caucasus, T'bilisi, Supra, Stalin by Progressive Management
Cover of the book NATO's Air War in Libya: A Template for Future American Operations - Operation Unified Protector, Operation Odyssey Dawn, Air Power, Afghan Model, Limited Boots On Ground (LBoG) Model by Progressive Management
Cover of the book U.S. Army Field Manual: Knowledge Management Section (FM 6-01.1) - Integrating KM into Operations of Brigades, Divisions, and Corps by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Air Force Doctrine Document 3-52: Airspace Control - Command and Organization, Cross-Domain Integration, Planning and Execution, Major Operations and Campaigns, Irregular Warfare by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Inside the International Space Station (ISS): NASA Command and Data Handling (CDH) Astronaut Training Manual by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Laws and Regulations Governing the Protection of Sensitive But Unclassified Information: Classification Directives, FOIA, State Department Emails, Nuclear and Missile Technology, DoD, NASA, NRC, TSA by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Threat from Iran: Reassessing the Implications of a Nuclear-Armed Iran and the Iranian Puzzle Piece - Understanding Iran in the Global Context by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II: Weapon of Denial - Air Power and the Battle for New Guinea, Japanese Onslaught, Coral Sea through Milne Bay, Air Power and the Supply War by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Trinity: The World's First Atomic Explosion - History of the Atomic Bomb Test and the New Mexico Test Site, Rehearsal Shot, Report on Nuclear Energy Released, Damage Effects, Observations by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy