MDMA-induced serotonergic neurotoxicity

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Physiological Psychology
Cover of the book MDMA-induced serotonergic neurotoxicity by Dominik Buchmüller, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Dominik Buchmüller ISBN: 9783640439676
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 6, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Dominik Buchmüller
ISBN: 9783640439676
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 6, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Psychology - Biological Psychology, grade: A (100%), New College Durham (Duke University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience), course: Behavior and Neurochemistry, language: English, abstract: It is the aim of this paper to review and integrate relevant empirical findings and theoretical discussions concerning the molecular and cellular mechanisms and effects of MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity in laboratory animals. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a derivative of the synthetic psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH). It also shares some structural and pharmacological properties of mescaline, a naturally occurring psychedelic hallucinogen. At the molecular level, all three substances resemble the monoamine neurotransmitters epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA). They mimic the neurophysiological actions and effects of E and DA, as well as serotonin (5-HT). METH and MDMA do so by binding to, and reversal of monoamine-specific transporter proteins at the presynaptic plasma membrane. While the psychological effects of METH are mainly due its action as a DA release agent and reuptake inhibitor, MDMA primarily affects the serotonergic system. It has a high affinity for the serotonin-specific transporter (SERT), which carries it into the presynaptic neuron. Inside the cell, MDMA inhibits the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), pre-venting intracellular 5-HT from being stored in synaptic vesicles. In addition, MDMA phos-phorylates SERT, which causes a reversal of its reuptake function and, hence, non-exocytotic efflux of 5-HT by the means of passive diffusion. Because neurotransmitter release normally only occurs in case of an action potential, and the released transmitter is partly reabsorbed and recycled, the reverse functioning of SERT depletes 5-HT stores. The equivalent effect of METH via reversal of the DA transporter (DAT) has been linked to its neurotoxic properties (Yamamoto & Zhu, 1998). As a derivative of methamphetamine, MDMA is sometimes believed to have inherited the severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity of METH and its parent compound amphetamine. Such neurotoxic potential has been found in mice but not in rats (Colado, O'Shea, and Green, 2004), and remains to be established for non-human primates. The probably most prominent publication claiming that MDMA caused irreversible damage to primate DA neurons (Ricaurte et al., 2002) was shown to be in error and had to be retracted. Instead of a recreational dose of MDMA (3 2 mg/kg), the monkeys had, in fact, been given METH, which, at such doses, is known to be neurotoxic in primates (Villemagne et al., 1998). [...]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Psychology - Biological Psychology, grade: A (100%), New College Durham (Duke University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience), course: Behavior and Neurochemistry, language: English, abstract: It is the aim of this paper to review and integrate relevant empirical findings and theoretical discussions concerning the molecular and cellular mechanisms and effects of MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity in laboratory animals. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a derivative of the synthetic psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH). It also shares some structural and pharmacological properties of mescaline, a naturally occurring psychedelic hallucinogen. At the molecular level, all three substances resemble the monoamine neurotransmitters epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA). They mimic the neurophysiological actions and effects of E and DA, as well as serotonin (5-HT). METH and MDMA do so by binding to, and reversal of monoamine-specific transporter proteins at the presynaptic plasma membrane. While the psychological effects of METH are mainly due its action as a DA release agent and reuptake inhibitor, MDMA primarily affects the serotonergic system. It has a high affinity for the serotonin-specific transporter (SERT), which carries it into the presynaptic neuron. Inside the cell, MDMA inhibits the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), pre-venting intracellular 5-HT from being stored in synaptic vesicles. In addition, MDMA phos-phorylates SERT, which causes a reversal of its reuptake function and, hence, non-exocytotic efflux of 5-HT by the means of passive diffusion. Because neurotransmitter release normally only occurs in case of an action potential, and the released transmitter is partly reabsorbed and recycled, the reverse functioning of SERT depletes 5-HT stores. The equivalent effect of METH via reversal of the DA transporter (DAT) has been linked to its neurotoxic properties (Yamamoto & Zhu, 1998). As a derivative of methamphetamine, MDMA is sometimes believed to have inherited the severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity of METH and its parent compound amphetamine. Such neurotoxic potential has been found in mice but not in rats (Colado, O'Shea, and Green, 2004), and remains to be established for non-human primates. The probably most prominent publication claiming that MDMA caused irreversible damage to primate DA neurons (Ricaurte et al., 2002) was shown to be in error and had to be retracted. Instead of a recreational dose of MDMA (3 2 mg/kg), the monkeys had, in fact, been given METH, which, at such doses, is known to be neurotoxic in primates (Villemagne et al., 1998). [...]

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Both Marx and Weber articulated theories of social change, and advanced explanations for the origin of capitalism. Who was right? Or can the two be synthesised? by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Social and religious aspects in Bram Stoker's DRACULA by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Charles Darwin's 'The Origin of Species': Science, rhetoric and revolution by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Die GmbH-Reform im Jahr 2008 by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book 'Mrs Dalloway' in Love by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Entscheidungsunterstützung bei Zielkonflikten am Beispiel der PKW Entwicklung by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Swap and other structured products: Critical review of recent development as tool in financial risk management applications by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Demand and supply by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Harry M. Markowitz - Portfolio Theory and the Financial Crisis by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Borderline personality disorder by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book The importance of customer relationship management in the automotive supply industry by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Extensive Reading by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book To what extent do you agree with those who argue that the UK should join the European Monetary Union (EMU)? by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book The North-South Divide in England by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book The System of Wage-Setting Japan, Germany and the US: Towards Convergence? by Dominik Buchmüller
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy