Wither Power Politics?

A Study of the United States' Approach to the Caspian Sea Region 1991-2001

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Wither Power Politics? by Bradley Axmith, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Bradley Axmith ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Bradley Axmith
ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Alexis de Tocqueville by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Mangelndes Engagement am Arbeitsplatz by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Mobbing an Schulen. Ursachen, Beteiligte und Prävention by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Effekt der Heirat auf den Erwerbsverlauf von Frauen und Männern by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Der kategorische Imperativ als Lehrstück by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Samuel P. Huntingtons These vom Kampf der Kulturen und seine Darstellung des Islams by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Das erziehungsbedürftige Kind - ein unbeschriebens Blatt by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Performance comparison and study the impact of marketing expenses, wages & salary and age on the firm performance in Indian Cotton Textile Industry by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Sammlung diverser Berichte - Band VI: Positionspapier für ein Senioren- und Pflegeheim und 'Betreutes Wohnen' in Berlin Steglitz by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Wertansatzwahlrechte unter bilanzpolitischem Aspekt by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Taktik und Taktiktraining im Fußball by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Was ist behavioristisches Denken? by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die Montessori-Pädagogik im Kontext des Förderschwerpunkts Lernen und des gemeinsamen Unterrichts by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die russisch-orthodoxe Kirche in Deutschland in Zeiten des Nationalsozialismus und der Nachkriegszeit by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Bilanzanalyse mit Kennzahlen - Auswirkungen des Bilanzmodernisierungsgesetzes auf die Kennzahlen Interpretation by Bradley Axmith
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy